Monotone increasing and bounded above ⇒ converges to supremum.
Def'n. Monotonic
A sequence (an) is (strictly) monotone increasing if
an≤an+1(an<an+1),∀n≥1
Thrm 1.
n→∞liman=inf(an)
proof. We'd like to show that
∀ϵ.∃N.∀n≥N.∣an−L∣≤ϵ
Let L=inf(an). Let ϵ>0, take aN∈(an) s.t. L−ϵ<aN. Then L−ϵ<aN≤an≤L for all n≥N.⇒∀n≥N.∣an−L∣<ϵ
Corollary 2.
Consider closed, non-empty nested intervals In⊇In+1⊇In+2..., then then ∩n∞In=∅
proof. Let In=[an,bn], then we have two monotone sequence (an) is increasing, (bn) is decreasing. Then, ∀k≥1.ak≤lim∞an≤lim∞bn≤bk
Then, we can show ⇒[lim∞an,lim∞bn]=[sup(an),inf(bn)]⊆∩n≥1In
Example 1
(D&D 2.6.B) Let a1=0,an+1=5+an, find whether it's convergent and if convergent what's the limit.
Monotone
a2an+1=5>0=a1=5+an>5+an−1=an
Bounded above an+12=5+an<5+an+1. Let x=an+1⇒x2<5+x⇒x2−x−5<0. x∈[21−21,21+21]⇒an+1=x is bounded above.
In fact, L=lim5+an−1=5+L⇒L2=L−5. solve and take L>0 since monotone increasing, then L=21+21
Example 2
(D&D 2.6.I) Let (an) be bounded, define limsupan=bn=sup{ak:k≥n} for n≥1. Prove that (bn) converges.
Monotonebn≤bn+1 since bn=max(an,sup{ak:k≥n+1})=max(an,bn+1)≥bn+1
Bounded below∀n≥1.an≥M,bn=sup(ak:k≥n)≥M
∃L<∞.limbn=n→∞limk≥nsupanL
RemarkLu=limsupak≥liminfak=Ll, if Lu=Ll=L⇒limak=L
Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem
Every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence
Def'n Subsequence
A subsequence of (an) is a sequence (ank) where n1<n2<...
proof. Let (an)⊆[−M,M]. Construct the subsequence by - picking I1⊂[−M,M] that contains infinitely many an s.t. ∣I1∣≤M/2 - ... - picking In⊂In−1 that contains infinitely many an s.t. ∣In∣≤∣In−1∣/2≤M/2n.
By Nested interval lemma, ∩n≥1In=∅, take L∈∩In.
Pick an∈In,∀n≥1 Since L∈In⇒∣an−L∣≤∣In∣<M/2n.
Then ∀ϵ>0, take Nϵ s.t. ϵ>M/2Nϵ>∣aNϵ−L∣ but ∣an−L∣≤∣In∣≤∣INϵ∣/2n−Nϵ,∀n≥Nϵ