Surface Tangents and Derivatives
Tangent Plane
The tangent vector to a surface \(\Sigma\) at point \(p\) are tangent vector to all smooth curves on \(\Sigma\) through \(p\) at \(p\).
The tangent plane to a surface \(\Sigma\) at point \(p\) is a 2-dim linear subspace of \(T_p\Sigma\subset\mathbb R^3\), a.k.a. a plane in \(\mathbb R^3\) pass through the origin. its points are precisely all tangent vectors to \(\Sigma\) at \(p\).
Spanning Tangent Plane
Claim Let \(\sigma:U\rightarrow V\cap \Sigma\) be a surface path containing \(p\). If \(U\) is spanned by vectors \(u, v\), then \(T_p\Sigma\) is spanned by \(d_u\sigma, d_v\sigma\).
proof. Consider a surface patch \(\sigma: U\rightarrow V\cap \Sigma\) containing \(p\). Let \(\gamma\) be a smooth curve in \(S\) with some \(\gamma(t_0) = p\). Then, consider \(\mathbf a:[t_0-\epsilon, t_0+\epsilon]\rightarrow U\) s.t. \(\gamma(t) =\sigma(\mathbf a(t)))\), a.k.a. \(\mathbf a\) is a path on \(U\) that is mapped to \(\gamma\). Then, we must have that \(\mathbf a\) is a smooth curve on \(U\).
Let \(a(t) = (u(t), v(t))\), then by chain rule, we have
Therefore, \(\frac{d\gamma}{dt}\) is spanned by \(d_u\sigma,d_v\sigma\).
Conversely, define \(\tilde \gamma(t) = \sigma(u(t_0)+\lambda t, v(t_0) + \mu t)\) for some \(\lambda, \mu\). Then, \(\tilde \gamma\) is a smooth curve in \(\Sigma\) and \(\gamma(0) = p\) we have that
Therefore, every vector in \(\text{span}\{d_u\sigma, d_v\sigma\}\) is the tangent vector at \(p\) of \(\Sigma\).
By regularity assumption of \(\sigma\), we have that \(\text{span}\{d_u\sigma, d_v\sigma\}\) are 2-dim, hence spans a plane, in which we call it the tangent plane.
Independence of surface patch choices
Claim For some surface path \(\sigma(u,v)\) at \(p\), the spanned subset space of \(d_u\sigma, d_v\sigma\) independent of the choice of \(\sigma\).
proof. Suppose that \(\tilde \sigma: \tilde U\rightarrow V\cap \Sigma\) is a reparameterization of the surface patch. Then, note that both \(\sigma, \tilde\sigma\) are bijective and smooth. Therefore, exists a bijective smooth map \(\phi: U\rightarrow\tilde U\) s.t. \((\tilde u, \tilde v) = \phi(u,v)\). Then, we have
Therefore, \(d_u\sigma\) and \(d_v\sigma\) are both linear combinations of \(d_{\tilde u}\tilde \sigma, d_{\tilde v}\tilde \sigma\).
Surface Derivatives
Implicit Function Theorem
By inverse function theorem, for non-linear function \(F\)
IF \(F(\mathbf x_0) = \mathbf y_0 ,DF(\mathbf x)\) is invertible, and \(y_0 + DF(x_0)(x-x_0)\) is invertible
THEN, the inverse exists, \(F^{-1}(\mathbf y_0)= \mathbf x_0, \mathbf y = \mathbf x_0 + DF^{-1}|_{\mathbf y_0}(\mathbf y-\mathbf y_0)\)
Regularity Conditions
Claim for any point \(p\) on the regular surface \(\Sigma\), there exists an open set \(V\subset \Sigma\) s.t. \(p\in V\) and \(V\) is the graph of a smooth function \(z=\phi(x,y), y=\varphi(x,z), x=\psi(y,z)\).
In other words, for any points on a surface. Locally, the surface patch can be mapped from a standard plane.
proof. Let \(\sigma^{-1}(p) = (u_0, v_0)\). Consider the surface patch mapping \(\sigma\), by regularity we have that
such that each of the \(2\times 2\) submatrix are invertible.
WLOG, assume that
is invertible, then consider the orthogonal projection \(\Pi_{XZ}\) of \(V\) to XZ plane.
Consider the composition \(\Pi_{XZ} \circ \sigma: U\rightarrow V\rightarrow W:= (u, v)\rightarrow (x, 0, z)\) where \(W\) is an open subset of XZ plane.
Therefore, the claim is equivalent to that \(\Pi_{XZ}\circ\sigma\) is locally invertible, a.k.a.
Consider the Taylor expansion of \(\Pi_{XZ}\circ \sigma\) near \((u_0, v_0)\)
Therefore, we are approximating the composition by the invertible linear map. Then, by implicit funciton theorem, there exists a unique solution \(y = \psi(x, z)\) near \((x_0, z_0)\) where \(\psi\) is differentiable.
Corollary Regularity condition satisfies IFF the tangent plane at \(p\) exists, and indeed, is a plane.
Smooth Maps
Consider \(\Sigma_1, \Sigma_2\) to be smooth surfaces, and let \(f: \Sigma_1\rightarrow \Sigma_2\) be a map.
For some point \(p_1\in \Sigma_1\), take \(p_2 = f(p_1) \in \Sigma_2\). Let \(\sigma_1: U_1\rightarrow V_1\cap \Sigma_1, p_1\in V_1\) and \(\sigma_2: U_2\rightarrow V_2\cap \Sigma_2, p_2\in V_2\).
Consider the composition function \(g:=\sigma_2^{-1}\circ f\circ \sigma_1: U_1\subset \mathbb R^2\rightarrow U_2\subset \mathbb R^2\), i.e.
Then, we define \(f\) is differentiable (smooth) at \(p = \sigma(u,v)\) if \(g\) is differentiable as \(Dg = \begin{bmatrix}\partial_u a&\partial_va \\\partial_u \beta&\partial_v\beta\end{bmatrix}\), and \(f\) is a differentiable (smooth) map if \(\forall p\) is differentiable.
If we linearize \(f\) near a point \(p_1\), then we have that
maps from a a tangent plane \(T_{p_1}\Sigma_1 = \text{span}\{\partial_u\sigma_1, \partial_v\sigma_1\}\) to \(T_{p_2}\Sigma_2 = \text{span}\{\partial_u\sigma_2, \partial_v\sigma_2\}\)